{"id":514,"date":"2026-02-08T15:19:34","date_gmt":"2026-02-08T15:19:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/csr-italia.org\/?page_id=514"},"modified":"2026-04-14T14:01:29","modified_gmt":"2026-04-14T14:01:29","slug":"criteri-di-affidabilita","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/csr-italia.org\/en\/informazioni\/criteri-di-affidabilita\/","title":{"rendered":"Reliability criteria"},"content":{"rendered":"

The reliability of CSR analyses derives from the method applied and from the systemic coherence of the assessments, not from the apparent authority of sources nor from the mere quantity of information collected.

Information acquired through open-source materials is integrated into the analytical framework CSR \u2014 Multi-System Tension (MST)<\/a><\/em><\/strong>, which makes it possible to assess its coherence, relevance and meaning within the systemic framework of reference.

For this reason, each piece of content is constructed in a traceable, contextualised and verifiable manner, within the limits inherent to the available open-source materials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Minimum criteria<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Each analysis is built on the basis of minimum reliability criteria, including:

\u2013 source traceability, with attention to origin, relay chain, date and context
\u2013 cross-verification of information through multiple independent confirmations
\u2013 methodological transparency, distinguishing between what is established, what is estimated and what remains uncertain
\u2013 clarity between data and interpretation, distinguishing facts, assessments and inferences
\u2013 temporal and contextual corroboration, with attention to coherence in relation to timeline, geography and the interests of the actors involved

For an overall view of the analytical process, see also the

CSR Analysis Method<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

How we handle uncertainty and updates<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Inferences are explicitly identified as such and supported with clear reasoning.

When the available data are not conclusive, plausible alternative hypotheses are indicated.

Content may be updated when new informational elements emerge or when the relevant analytical framework changes.

Where useful, the level of confidence of the assessment \u2014 low, medium or high \u2014 is also indicated, together with the relevant caveats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What We Do Not Do<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For the sake of clarity towards readers and users of its content, CSR Italia:

\u2013 does not produce operational intelligence
\u2013 does not engage in lobbying activities
\u2013 does not provide political or commercial advisory services
\u2013 does not base its analyses on sources that are unverifiable or not corroborated

The analyses published do not constitute operational recommendations, but instruments for strategic understanding and assessment.

CSR Italia conducts strategic open-source analysis and does not produce classified assessments or operational information.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L\u2019affidabilit\u00e0 delle analisi CSR deriva dal metodo applicato e dalla coerenza sistemica delle valutazioni, non dall\u2019autorit\u00e0 apparente delle fonti n\u00e9 dalla sola quantit\u00e0 delle informazioni raccolte. Le informazioni acquisite attraverso fonti open-source vengono integrate nel framework analitico CSR \u2014\u00a0Multi-System Tension (MST)\u00a0\u2014 che consente di valutarne coerenza, rilevanza e significato nel quadro sistemico di riferimento. Per […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":21,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-with-title","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-514","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t